1 Percenters as Consanguine

1 percenters, in this blog publication refers to the 1 percent of the world’s population that holds 99% of the worlds wealth. Thus if anyone is confused why this term is used in these publications, then be confused no longer. As numbers and pecuniary influences fluctuate on a global scale, I am positive that some “scholar” can dispute the 99% rule of thumb  of how much wealth the elite of the world actually hold. But, most scholars would not want to touch that subject because whatever accurate percentage that could be accurately calculated would still be a total embarrassment of wealth tipping the scales in the 1 percenter’s favor.  In fact, 99% may be too modest of what wealth the 1 percenters truly possess. However, the term “1 percenter” pretty much says it all.

Knavery of the Pillarist

So you think you can Augur Life Skills?

You do not have to travel to far to witness the debauched approach of employers attempting to handle the labor force. There is an alarming, systematic “flash in a pan-ism” infiltrating our life lines. Our right to mature and receive the benefits of aging are being stripped away by scholars, Knaves, systemisers that figure they can learn wisdom by reading a book or listening to a lecture. In essence, they figure they can automate or simulate the absorption of “life skills”. To even think you can teach “life skills” with a text book, computer program, or eBook, that has been created to eliminate the need for generational wisdom, is absolutely retarded.

Life Skills, not Timothy Leary Pills

The only way to learn life skills is to live life. That is why they call it “Life Skills”. They do not call it, S.S. “Simulated Skills” To watch TV programs that show a young group of geniuses solving life’s problems in forty minutes or less, is not “Life Skills”. Thus if you take TV programs or methods like this seriously, then, SAO, “Smoke Another One”, or, HAD, “Have Another Drink”, or, PAPP, “Pop Another Prescription Pill”. Timothy Leary was the psychedelic, hallucinogenic, LSD  guru that attempted to learn wisdom by the use of drugs, ultimately attempting to stimulate inner growth by the use of drugs. An early example of some scholar attempting to gain wisdom by short cut. Kind of like Basil Brown who drank carrot juice until he died of vitamin A poisoning. But, it is proof that he had to live through that experience to die, learning that you should not drink that much carrot juice. Of course, he could of avoided dying by being aware of vitamin overdose warnings. Perhaps he wanted to die or he just did not possess any “life skills”, like being able to read or reason.

The Fool Succeeds Where the Hermit Knows Not to Tread

There are no short cuts to attain “life skills”. You have to live through the trials and tribulations that mold these skills. We can also learn from the mistakes of others. Like people that have the wisdom and benefit of living through experiences gained. Although we may be able to absorb most of what these experienced people tell us, we still have to live through these experiences to truly learn these lessons. These experienced people can only provide the knowledge, teaching us the best way to “live” through the situations. Older people that have survived as long as they have, offer valuable insights and wisdom that we should all listen to, and cherish the fact that they are willing to share. Yet, we seem as a society, to spurn this offer of valuable insight and throw these experienced, enlightened people in old folks homes to rot.  What a waste. Have you ever gone to the dump lately? People have absolutely no idea of the value they dump on a weekly basis. All one has to do is open their eyes to see the treasure.

Conformed Fear of Ridicule

Capitalistic societies seem to adopt the “flash in the pan-ism” philosophy on the merits that it “fits” into their 1 percent agenda of “Global Financial Domination”.  They use secret societies, IE: The Illuminati to achieve this aspiration through, where it makes sense, fear and ridiculousness. Scare the scare-able and ridicule the ridicule-able. This method is very effective especially in the “ridicule” aspect, keeping people down and non-inquisitive when pertaining to their illusive degradation only to keep conformed people in control by the use of the “conformed fear of ridicule”. You have to think of “purse strings” as the “puppeteer’s strings”. Purse strings are used by the one percenters to keep you dancing to their financial tune. Puppeteer’s strings are used to keep the puppets dancing to their whimsical control. Thus, the 1 percenters are the CEO’s puppeteers. CEOs are the  politician’s puppeteers, politicians are the employers puppeteers, and the employers are the everyday Joe’s and Jane’s puppeteers. Where does the religious or the cleric fall into this progression? It doesn’t, at least not anymore. They are beginning to be considered social outcasts because of the 1 percenter’s social engineering.

Free Mason’s Jar

It is hard to conceive how these ridiculous organizations have gained so much power and following. Mostly because, at one time, people looked to them as an alternative to anarchy. Anarchy was an useful tool during the medieval periods, creating the allusion that there was a need for one commerce to keep all who conformed, safe and secure. As people became more educated and less ignorant, it became exceedingly harder for the 1 percenters to keep control as an open monarchy rule. Thus trading monarchy for secret power societies that manipulate power structures, like parliaments, and democracies, to basically create a so called safe alternative to socialism. Socialism was the downfall to monarchy and is the downfall to the 1 percenters reign of power. They definitely knew this before it even was conceived by Carl Marx. Marxism, by conception, was to make everyone equal in their productivity. Everyone worked and earned equal retribution of the societies assets. No one would have control over anyone else, and everyone would have an equal share to the spoils of their productivity, and an equal say in the political direction. In theory, it was pristine. Only truly greedy people would find fault in this system, like the 1 percenters.

Spy verses Spy

Socially planted surrogates were quickly placed by the 1 percenters when socialism overthrew monarchy in Russia. Quickly, they were able infiltrate the political arena of the newly established reign of power that by design, was to put the workers of society in control.  These surrogates were very successful, and because of the death of Vladimir Lenin, his successor, (The one percenter’s main surrogate) Joseph Stalin, caused socialism to fail. That is to say, Joseph Stalin corrupted socialism into a communist dictatorship, hardly resembling what Carl Marx conceived, and what Lenin tried to implement as the reigning power structure of the new socialist society. Socialism died with Vladimir Lenin in 1924. Joseph Stalin was a full fledged dictator. Thus it is easy to see why his new communist party was the enemy of so called democracies of the world and also the enemy of the socialist oriented parties of Russia. Divided and conquered ensuring its death, even though it was a very slow death. To make a long story short, the workers of Russia were never in control.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2016

Did I mention we hate spam?

Please take note that if you subscribe to leave a comment then unsubscribe, your comment will be deleted. If your email address domain links to any blacklists, I will terminate the account without hesitation or warning. If you are confused by our policy not to adopt spam supporters, then please read the “about” page. This may anger people, justifying that “spam” is their way to make a living. Great! Just do it somewhere else. Thanks

Genesis, Mendacity, Aborticide


Abortion is nothing new and has been widely practiced in commercial corporate North America, and other countries, legally and illegally, for a century or more. Of course, I am almost positive it has been practiced for millenniums, just in a more hushed, crude mannerism. Biblically, it is an absolute no no. However, we have scholars and study groups that attempt to twist the Bible’s word for their own purposes. These skeptics usually ride on the LTDEWWITBTCATHF (let’s tear down every word written in the bible to contradict anyone that has faith) wagon. It is currently a pretty big wagon. Lets face the fact that there are a lot of “sinners” that cling to this sinister, perfidious, barouche. The main argument for abortion is, in my opinion, pretty lame.

Murder, She Rout

Sperm is ejaculated from the penis into the vagina or artificially inseminated into the womb. The sperms then begin their journey (race) towards the egg to impregnate. Once a lucky sperm manages to get to this low percentile target, and penetrates the egg, the fetus starts to grow. Not before. Not after. Right at that moment of conception. Done deal. Pretty simple concept. Not rocket science. Pro-abortionists would have you believe that because it is not classified as a real human being yet, you can kill the fetus. Like eating a fertilized chicken egg. Wrong. Anyone that has cracked open a fertilized chicken egg that received the correct amount of heat (98 degrees), for a about eight hours, will see blood in this egg. No, that is not voodoo. It is the fetus starting to grow and form. Because the human egg, instantly, recieves the correct amount of heat, the fetus starts growing immediately.

No Brains, No Pain

Pro-abortionists hinge on the fact that the brain has not developed. They believe there is no real living being to worry about, thus it can be killed without remorse. They maintain that the fetus is somehow not conscience therefore has no worth. Any woman that had an abortion, or miscarriage, most likely would have a different opinion. Women that are “victims” of abortion/miscarriage develop great remorse and emotional issues after the fact. They have feelings of great loss in the “spiritual” and voided sense. However, that is not allowed in commercial corporate North America because it does not “fit” into a ruthless, capitalist, greed-orientated society.

Dictated Pro-Choice

Yes, you read correctly.” Women that are “victims” of abortion/miscarriage”. I do not believe any woman is in the proper state of mind to make that decision when pregnant. I am not suggesting they cannot make their own decisions, but it seems when a woman makes this decision, it is rarely, solely, their own because of the emotions involved. These women always seem to have others around them, family, friends, doctors or professionals pushing them into this decision. Saying that it is for the best. Best for who? If these women would of consulted a cleric, minister or priest, they may of had a different light shone on the situation. More balanced. Clerics, ministers and priests (if competent) would not tell the woman what to do, rather point out the positive aspects of pro-life. This can create a more stable decision-making environment allowing her the power to make the right choice rather than being pushed into a serious decision that may scar the woman’s psyche for life.

Only You Can Prevent Feticide

But the “barouche” pushes on into the depths of idiocy, not respecting other countries’ morals, values or traditions, force-feeding everyone with their capitalist, self-righteous propaganda-pabulum. Genocide. Feticide. Lets call it what really is and not attempt to twist the meaning of established philosophy. In fact, we seem to frown more on “herbicide” then “feticide”. We are being told not control what plant forms grow in certain areas with herbicides because it is not “natural”, yet we are encouraged to abort a fetus from a woman’s body. Something terribly wrong with that picture. Has anyone ever camped in a controlled camping site/area and collected dead wood laying about in the bush to make a camp fire? Then, have some “retard park attendant/ranger” come out of no-where and say “put that wood back where you found it because you are “disturbing” the natural reforestation”. Yes, that happened to me once. I then asked the park attendant “do you want me to place every piece of dead wood back in it’s exact, original location?”. Unfortunately, you cannot do that with an aborted/miscarried fetus.

eJACulation the Ripper

Illustration-wise, dead wood really has no relation to a dead fetus, other then being good fertilizer, but it does show the stupidity of what we are “brainwashed” to think is important. Dead wood important, new human fetus not important. This does not suggest all women that have had abortions should be metaphorically “burned at the stake”, or even censured. It means our value system is so corrupted and manipulated by whatever the current, 1 percenters, agenda propagates through our learning systems like a computer virus. Dismantling the Bible and the faith it invokes. Tearing away our spirituality, with small, sharp, fish hooks, ripping your soul into tiny little smidgens of distorted belief. Yes, like “Hell Raiser”. However, it is not the “prime evils” that are coming to rip your soul apart. It is a bunch eccentric, egotistical, snobbish, money grubbing 1 percenters monetarily subverting our beliefs and spirituality. If you want money? Drink from the poison well and become “agents of misfortune”. Or just sell your soul.

Put a Rubber on it

Women that want (have) the choice to abort a child should think about the responsibility of having such a choice. Moralistically, abortion is not a sound choice because it implies carelessness. Contraceptives are available so, really, there is no excuse not to use them, even in 3rd world countries because they are not that expensive. But, because of capitalism, they have not figured out how to turn a profit by educating and supplying people that, have no knowledge and/or, cannot afford contraceptives. That would mean they would have to give them away as “charity”. So what is the solution? Legalize abortion in all countries and apply pressure on countries that refuse to legalize abortion. That way they can push more health care and make more money! Sell more drugs back to the countries they steal the drugs from in the first place.

Viral Cloud of Disdain

Viruses, that are linked to birth defects, seemingly convey the justification for abortion. There are many substances that are linked to birth-defects that we ingest or breath-in everyday. No matter what the health or viral concerns may be in whatever country, respect has to be shown for life and should not be treated as a disposable product at any stage of existence. Once the fetus starts to grow, it is alive, brains or no brains. To think otherwise is irresponsible and nefarious. But of course, commercial corporate North America has already normalized abortion so what do we have to worry about? Just kill it before it spreads.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on January 30, 2016

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Propaganda Panacea Proselytism

Everyday Deceptive Boondoggle

Having a recent conversation with my brother about employment factors and the realities of what may shift employability from one extreme to another opened my eyes on the shared attitudes of people that are fortunate enough to have a stable income. People that have stability in their assets and proceeds, whether they are retired or still working, blue collar or white collar, have a dangerous perception on why people are unemployed or destitute. Dangerous in the fact that, they do not fault the government. They fault the social aspect, the community and/or the persons underemployed, jobless or indigent. Summarily leaving the government “painfully” faultless. The government, whether municipal, provincial/state, or federal, is and, should be held accountable for any unemployment or necessitous. Hey, these individuals (Politicians) are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for their so-called service to the people and after 8 years , are eligible to a premium pensionable retirement. Thus, why should they not be held accountable?

Extortion Coercion Opprobrium

People that control the government decide where our taxes are applied and can create the environments for prosperity where all can benefit. To keep the masses working is to the best benefit of the government. They work for us, not the other way around. So why are they (politicians) paid so handsomely and assured a prosperous future after service? To keep us in a working, viable country to ensure all can prosper and retire in dignity. Does this happen? I do not think anyone can argue that prosperity does not indeed happen for everyone. In fact, I would go as far as saying that the majority of people are not assured anything whatsoever. When I pay my tax dollar, I get no guarantee that the government is spending my tax dollar in my best interest. Whether you live in Canada, United States or even Mexico, political scandals are leaked out to alternative media feeds, streams, and/or print. Some of these scandals are so obvious that the main con stream media has no choice but to publish these infractions. Most of these scandals are about misappropriated money/funds, pensions, grants and/or resources. Do the infracting politicians, that are suspected of involvement, really need to be stealing more money than they already, legally, harvest from the system? Perhaps because they are ravenous?

Concessive Depressive of the Molested

Perceptions that do not fault the government for the downfalls of society is a major copout because people that protect the government in this manner are afraid of change. They fear this change because of the impact it may have on their livelihood. Understandable. But still, if you have a room of hundred people, and only one is filthy rich, cannot anyone see the problem with this picture? That one person has exceedingly more wealth then the ninety-nine remaining people in that room combined. IE: 99% of the population of that room holds 1% or less of the prosperity, while the 1% of the population of that room holds 99% of the prosperity (wealth). If any person believes that this is a fair ratio, then they are either stupid, ignorant, or simply unaware. Or they are the 1 percenter person of that room. If I was in a room of 100 people and I had 100 apples and I gave 1 apple to the 99 remaining people to share. I would think it would be safe to say I was being greedy.

Monarch-Capitalism Theorem

Why can 1 percent of the population have and keep this ratio of prosperity from the remaining 99 percent? It is because the government of the people allow this to happen. The government works for the masses, but is controlled by the 1 percenters. Sad, but a harsh truth. If anyone complains or makes accusations in this manner, they are called communists. I call this ratio the Monarch-Capitalism Theorem. Because, that one person in that capitalist room is definitely as rich, if not more, then any, past or present, Monarch. Again, I am sure, some university scholar can mathematically prove the necessity of this Monarch-Capitalism ratio. Why we as the masses should accept and protect it’s conceptive deceptiveness, and embroider and cherish this idealism, as true democracy, vital to freedom and liberty. But, it would still sound like propaganda-scandalous.

Vainglorious Cognoscenti’ Indoctrination

How much does one person really need to live? To exist? You can bet your 1/99th slice of that apple the 1 percenters know exactly how little one person needs to survive in todays capitalist economy. They know right down to the penny. Anything over that, in their voracious-envisioned concept would be their definition of prosperity for the masses. Needless to say, much of that prosperity has to be borrowed from the debt-pushing banking institutions. In that manner, they even make more money (interest) off your borrowed prosperity. Cogent acceptance is the key that makes this portentous economy work, otherwise, we would just take our fair share. Admit the fact, that if there was 1 person in one room with all the apples, expecting 99 people to share only one apple, in reality, no holds barred, what do you think would happen? The one percenter person, in this room, would be overrun and the apples would be shared and distributed in a more equal fashion, even at the discretion of the “populace mentality”.

Prorated Proletariat

There would be people that would argue that the “populace” cannot govern itself. That it would be rampant and unorganized. Possibly. But to get to that point, you would have to “antagonize the multitude”. Why does there have to be a “mob mentality” at all? Because, that is the natural result when you give so little to so many, expecting them to accept and be content with the few scraps thrown from the 1 percenters plethora. A sense of anxiousness is always the element of the multitude because they really have no idea the power they have unified. If they did, that anxiousness and discord would be consecrated into one ominous force to be reckoned and feared by those who would be foolish enough to oppose. However, that never seems to happen because each person that makes up the mob is conquered and divided mentally. Brainwashed. If we followed the biblical cautionary guidance against “coveting”, then we would be unified with our neighbors, thus less susceptible to the “commercial citadel of babel” that convinces us, by the use of “covet level possessions”, to either buy that “covet level possession” or just be envious of thy neighbor.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on January 14, 2016

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

The Bravura of Competition Piquant

Exposing Private Lies

We as human beings compete from natural instinctiveness. So it may seem. Has it been bred into us, inbred into us, or is it a greedy need to grasp something before someone else does? I do not believe this personally because I think, when we are born, we have no competitive nature other then to survive. We were given brains like no other species. Thus why do we still act like jackals scrounging and fighting over a gazelle killed and half eaten by a neighboring lion family. Is this a desired behavior, or a side effect of social decimation. We, as humans, everyday, think and act in terms of competition. We behave in this mannerism like it is natural instinct. That is a potentially dangerous scenario that, in most cases, ends in some form of languid conflict.

Children that come up through the school system are taught that competition is good for the spirit and character. From kindergarten, and up through high school, this idealism is forcefully forged into their impressionable brains. Everyone in the classroom is aware who is the top student, and who is the dunce. The teacher is the culprit that usually exposes the weaknesses and strengths of all the students. What is the exact reasoning for this exposure? Why does this progression have to be evident to everyone in the classroom? Is it because we as adults, want to push our children to these idiotic extremes that were never attained when we were young? Thus we allow the school system to employ the competitive empowerment that is more destructive then getting the strap from the principle.

The Foully of Forged Evolution

Has the school system and their teachers progressed? I would think that they have most likely regressed and are far worse then ever before especially in the capitalist environment. If you look up the definition of “competition” you will be negatively informed, contradicting your brainwashed impression of competition. When a child wants to play a sport, the school system only has room for a certain amount of participants to play on the “school teams” therefore, pick the cream of the recruits of all who apply to play. What percentage of students get to be on these teams? Depends on the size of the school. In a sense, everyone gets to participate in physical activity during “gym class” and that is the forum that the competitive destructiveness and constructiveness begins. All at he hands of the haughty, drill sergeant mentality, serf driving gym teacher.

Some children progress in this precarious environment and most children become scarred for life in this “boor huddle of torment”. Why then do it at all? Because, the school system has to provide a certain amount of physical activity for your children, therefore use this opportunity to sift out the undesirables and promote the 1 to 2 percent that may make the school teams. Usually this is a performance based criterion, “natural ability”, that is utilized, therefore systematically decimating the other undesirables’ will to compete. This also means that any children that could of been “taught this ability potential” will most likely not develop the motivation to evolve because their will has been “shot down in flames” by the process. Teaching involves patients, encouragement, and nurturing. Most gym teachers that have these qualities are not employed.

Social Disgrace 101

Schools in the last 20 to 30 years have become social runnels, ultimately leading the majority of students to mediocracy. Is this a desired social result? To the 1 percenters and wealthy, it is a successful deviant necessary to keep the majority of the population to remain without hope or prosperity. In basics, you become a slave mentally and physically because you will have no notion that you are enslaved and will work until you die or until you are just not useful anymore. What does this say about our education system? Not much, thus if you send you children to school because you need day care and do not stay attuned to their progress and mental well being, you might as well send you child right to the street to survive as social outcasts. Because that is where they may end up as prostitutes, porn actors, gang members, drug pushers, and/or junkies, or just plain homeless and destitute.

The “professional bum” analogy may exist, but is used as an excuse by certain individuals to avoid the mental need to help the helpless. Thus, you can see how competitively twisted out social thinking is when we evaluate who the “top bum or bums” may be. Perhaps we could develop a “bum championship system”. This synopsis probably would get ratings and would have more then enough participants. This would also increase the suicide ands murder rate, in turn, thinning out our population of social undesirables because lets face it, if you cannot be evaluated as a “top bum” or even a “ranking bum”, drastic measures would be utilized because what is left to lose? This thought is far from original because there are many movies, current and past, that use this epitome.

The Thrill of Agony, the Victory of Defeat

Sports, from grade school to university, ultimately leading to professional, minor or major, teams keep this contorted vying spirted and augmenting like a cloud of airborne viral contamination, infecting all who breathe this essence of voraciousness. We have all cheered on our home professional team populated with possibly 1 or none local players, in a championship series, in a mob like presence, possibly breaking into a riot if our team wins or loses all in the name of capitalist competition. On the other hand, it could be just an excuse to lute local businesses for the “covet level possessions” the most people struggle or cannot afford to buy. But let us not forget Olympic type sports and endeavors that basically produce the same reckonable causatum. The ultimate gag-reel for the wealthy and 1 percenters.

We that Reject Brainwashed Residuals

There are a lot of parents that are wise to this downfall of public or mass populated schools no matter if they are public, private, religious or not. These smart parents homeschool their children in attempt to teach their children proper values and educate them in stress free environments free of stupid competitive attainment. Does this work? It works because children learn better in controlled, happy environments when allowed to evolve and chose freely to aspire the directions that they would “naturally” take when given these opportunities free of bullying and tyrannical suppression. Parents that are smart enough to take this venue also teach their children the realities that they will face instead of sheltering the child, using (screened) current news events to show what society can be like negatively and positively. (Screened meaning no brainwashed main con stream media, advertising, programming with advertising or any medium sponsored by commercialism.)

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on January 5, 2016

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Corporate Nemesis of Credit Jobbery

They are Dreaming of a Green Christmas

I cannot remember a Holiday that has been so trampled by commercial corporate North America then Christmas this season, and other seasons past. Over the years, as people get older, they attempt to stir clear of the over expenditures when giving gifts to seemingly everyone, family members or not, in there direct circle of cohabitation. Still, even if one can resist the use of credit cards as an excuse to “overspend”, there is still a large covet damper that will hover over your holiday spirit. I can truly say, at this point of society, it is clear that commercial corporate North America has stolen Christmas. They have stolen this holiday and warped the period into their own private, corporate owned, profiteered fundraising nightmare.

Scavengers of Slim Pickings

When walking from shop to shop, in local malls, vendors stand poised, like ravens in a pine tree overlooking the latest road kill, in front of their cash registers, waiting for their next purchase victim. These victims purchase gifts out of a jagged persuasive coveted need to purchase the right, overpriced (between $15.00 to $20.00 or higher), low quality item, guaranteed to break, or be misplaced by the 15th of January, for that not so special friend or family member. One does not have to look too far for this product jettison. When getting a gift, most people accept and appear appreciative of the gift, but in reality, it is usually shoved aside and forgotten. If the gift, however is equal to or exceeds the “covet level of expectations” (a level usually set by commercial corporate North America through brainwashed advertizing) that is entirely a different story.

These are usually gifts, like the latest and greatest game consoles (even though you bought that same console last year but now has an updated version). High quality jewelry (or so they say), high quality ipads, laptops, smartphones, HD TV’s. This includes most over priced and highly over rated electronics. Tools and household items can fit in this category as long as they equal or exceed a certain price-quality level. What is this price level? Usually $450.00 or higher. Taking the price tags off items is a very redundant practice because, IE: if you buy your daughter a smart phone, she will know exactly what was paid for the device. If it is the latest and greatest device of it’s type for the price range paid($450.00 or higher), she will love the gift! Why? Because commercial corporate North America has programmed her mind to appreciate that latest and greatest, covet level gift.

We Won’t Break Your Leg, Just your Life

Will these covet level gifts make your family member love you more? I doubt it to the highest level of scepticism. In reality, everyone appreciates gifts when given. But that is a euphemism for “even low quality gifts are appreciated as long as you spent money (usually $15.00 to $20.00 or higher). That is how we are programmed. So when you shop, that is exactly how you will act when looking for that “not so special gift for that not so special family member or friend”. If you are broke, don’t worry about it. Just use your “close to maxed out” credit card or go to a money store and sink further into the credit abyss. I guess there are even loan sharks around, but who needs loan sharks when you have places like “WWLMBPDYWUCIJAC INC. (We Will Lend You the Money, Because Pay Day or Your Welfare/Unemployment Check Is Just Around the Corner Incorporated)”. These sham outfits will set you up with a nice high interest (28 to 40%) loan with plenty of special fees.

Biblical Blasphemy

Remembering the Bible story when Jesus toppled vendor tables and stands of businesses attempting to do business on the day of the Sabbath (Sunday) gives me chills of what he would do to the average vendor market of today. A strong bolt of lightening or flood comes to mind. In fact, according to the Bible, lending money for interest is a direct infringement on the scriptures. Leviticus 25:35-37. So how can anybody, in the name of Jesus’s birthday, charge interest for any loan. The Bible never included any exceptions to that infringement to be inflicted on the poor or otherwise. The scriptures certainly did not provide loopholes for profiteers to crawl out of to justify charging a single penny of interest on any loan. Of course, there are most likely one or two, so called, scholars that would provide this loop hole, for a price of course. But commercial corporate North America would have you believe that the Bible was the greatest fable ever told. Bibles now, in some bookstores, reside beneath the New Age section, in a very small area, perhaps one shelf.

Debt Pushing Golden Horde

Commerce, corporations, banking institutions etc. would be baffled on a no interest concept. It just could not register in their greedy little brains. There are interest free loans you can get, for an example, on car and truck loans in certain promotions in the attempt to move more new vehicles. So it can be done. Or are interest free deals like this only executed when the company is totally desperate to increase car sales. In a nut shell, the car companies that have their own finance corporation will do this because the real profit is made off the vehicle. Ergo they still make money. But what about the banks? How do they survive? Who cares. Stuff your money in your mattress because banks offer little or no return for the use of your money, other then security that you will not lose your hard earned cash unless the economy totally crashes.

But, the so called experts of the economy believe in these banking practices, Wall Street, capitalism, and greed. But, of course they do not call greed by it’s name. They call it necessary commerce. Great deal for banks. The can use your money and pay you squat for that use, and still charge you service fees. Interest , if paid, is next to nothing, possibly .001%. If you want to lock your money away for one, two, five or ten years, then it may pay a few more percentage points, possibly 1 to 5 %. But when they loan you money, you have to pay the premium interest rate, and if it is under $20,000.00, you will pay between 18 and 40 percent interest. So why the difference? Why let them use your money for nothing and pay through the nose for credit at the same time? Because we are brainwashed to accept this difference as necessary.

I guess it is easy to see how people end up in financial hot water in January. The blame gets put on Christmas. But the birth of Christ has nothing to do with this brainwashed, twisted, corporate version of Christmas. Lets put the blame where it belongs shall we. On the 1 percenters, wealthy, debt pushers, corporations and banks. No matter how many university papers are published on how to govern and backlash the middle class and poor into financial oblivion, it will still seethe down to one incessant concept. Greed.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on December 26, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Hollywood Idol Garrotter

Corny Maze of Idolatry

There are many illusive stories that come out of Hollywood, but this genus is my favorite. No one can be sure if it is real or just a way to draw people into the celebrity maze of worship. It is intriguing to say the least. It would make sense to draw more people back to the hobknob of the entertainment industry because a lot of people, now, are just not interested in Hollywood obloquy. There are (were) famous personalities running scared of this phenomenon and in some cases, created a small media storm in its wake. However, in the end, this rebellion, would be orchestrated into a aberrant rant or a drug-induced delirium. I mean really, how hard would it be to convince the main con stream media to abdicate the personality and satirize such a story?

Virtual Coliseum of Reality

Is there any truth to the obscure stories that seem to surface mostly in the alternative media hub? I think these stories are somewhat credible, once you sift out the ridicule and defamation woven into these reports (clips). Normal people would ask, “why would they make fun of these stories?”. A CEO of a corporation would answer, “to make the story more goading and salable”. My answer would be: they (CEO’s and the 1 percenters) want to make these claims look ridiculous thus people will be entertained and not take them seriously. What happens to the surviving personalities that make these claims? They usually bend to the galling because these claims usually prevents them from applying their trade and making money.

Actors, performers, entertainers are a commodity. These chattels represent large fortunes and investments conveying large potential, present and future, emoluments. Not to mention residuals. In the end, if the personality conforms and drops the accusations, in most cases, they are allowed to continue their vocation. But the damage has already gutted their career because people, are too gullible and, are too quick to imbibe the propaganda pabulum. In a nutshell, commercial corporate North America and the 1 percenters know their audience and know how to pull the executive strings. Psychology, to be sure, plays a large role when these solecisms slip out of control from the puppet master’s grasp.

Dubious Witness or Just Ludicrous

Vague stories seem to trickle out of Hollywood and other saltlicks of the entertainment industries about bribes, sexual abuse and coercion, murder, sacrifice, satanic rituals, pedophilia, rape, payola, etc.. Some of these stories seem to involve some of the greatest current actors, male and female, in accusations that borderline the unbelievable and ludicrous. Yet, these stories are there if one looks for them. Some of these reports even involve highly respected political figures. Alternative news streams have these stories in the population but are not on the surface. One must dig a bit to find them using key words and or phrases. Of course, what would serve as a competence criterion to the validity of these stories?

Certainly, whether true or not, the personalities involved would not dare to address these allegations for the simple reason of the obscure sources, or at least whatever sources, that were used having been defamed (debunked by gatekeepers) or left in obscurity. Thus, there would be no pressure to address these accusations, unless they were formally charged and had a lawyer present. Still, some of these celebrities tend to dance that fine line allowing these stories to circulate, possibly for extra exposure, or more likely because there is no real control over these sources and/or stories/reports. However, these stories must of spawned from somewhere.

Curve Ball of Coercion

Still, even personally watching or reading some of these stories gives me chills down my spine. I can think of one celebrity that, since I viewed a human sacrifice story involving that celebrity, I cannot sit through any of their movies anymore. I end up turning it off. Is this a desired result from the reading/viewing of these allegation stories? Possibly wanting that desired result for that particular personality? Or is it “just desserts”? But, that particular personality does not seem to be getting less famous on the overall entertainment spectrum. Could it be because that celebrity decided to “play ball” in order to circumvent this ominous publicity? I think, whether these allegations are true or not, the latter would be the most likely case.

Nonetheless, when these stories surface either by the celebrity in their own defence, when involving direct threats or allegations, legal or otherwise, or through some low key obscure alternative media stream, or orphaned story on a website, the results are the same. Unless the personality ends up dead by suicide, accident, natural causes or otherwise, the end always seems desperate, erratic, crazed, incoherent, self-inflicted and isolated. The ones that are smart enough to remain in the “light” seem to evade the permanent, destructive tailwinds of this slander machine once set in motion. Anyone thinking this is a new thing, should think again. You can read history books, that are used to educate our children, that are based on conjecture and fables.

Despoilment of the Benign

So whatever ominous entity exists that induces these events that seem so destructive and calumnious, remain in the shadows creeping about like a chameleon, never to be clearly seen or heard. Specifically, it is not mysterious at all. It is just a group of wealthy or hired individuals, assembled by the 1 percenters. Their purpose is to brainwash and control the masses. An effective method is to control the entertainment industry and productions, to ensure their slimed quilled epitaph is followed to the letter, and any deviation will result in enigmatical dubiety, or death and mayhem.

People would like to think the world is a straight forward place with no real mysteries to challenge our narrow thought process. But that is not because we cannot think in the abstract. It is because, we were weaned and nurtured off censured information in the attempt to keep the masses calm and compliant, and easily led into slavery, serving the 1 percenters idealism of what society should become. In reality, it is just a bunch of overly greedy people that cannot give up or share their legacies and wealth that has been inherited on to them from generation to generation.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on December 20, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Good Old Fashioned Divorce

Cold Shoulder to Cheat On

Marriages and relationships are becoming a disposable institution. Matrimony just does not seem to have any value and, for a price, can wiped away like it never existed. First sign of trouble or disagreement, people, want a divorce and/or separation. Even though they gave their vows, “for better or worse, richer or poorer, sickness and in health, until death do they part”, just seems to be a phrase that means absolutely nothing. We cannot kid ourselves no longer. It happens far too frequently to have any real meaning to the individual that initiates the separation/divorce. People that vow to this promise, and break it, do not show any remorse after the separation or the divorce. In some extreme cases, some individuals celebrate the death of a marriage.

For Vanity, not Worse, Definitely not in Sickness, Only Health, For Richer, but Definitely not Poorer, Until it Gets Tough, Do We Part

Many marriages suffer from infidelity, money problems, social problems, alcohol and substance abuse issues, physical and mental abuse, child and sexual abuse and/or just plain compatibility (communication) problems. The latter (communication) is the most likely common culprit that breaks up marriages. Interfering friends, relatives, etc. that only serve as a communication barrier to the couple trying to work it out. How many times have you heard from a family member or so called friend, “she/he should just leave him/her”. Most likely if the couple were talking to a priest, cleric, or even a marriage counsellor, these individuals would offer some sort of reconciliation solution or plan to follow.

Two-Faced Division Decisions

So why are couples so hell bent on leaving each other. Morality plays a role, and just common faith in religion. No matter what a person’s religion is, the marriage institution is a sacred bond between two people. Even if the ceremony is performed by a judge, the matrimony ceremony is performed as a sacred bond between the couple. Thus, once married, the two people have vowed to spend their lives with one another no matter what happens until death do they part. So why is the law, and/or society so light on the occurrence of divorce. If a spouse leaves another spouse for little or no reason, then why should these individuals be able to file for the separation or divorce without at least submitting provable, valid reasons why the separation/divorce should take place. Biblically, most reasons for divorce and separation occurrences are not supported and would not be tolerated.

Heart Breaker, Law Shaker

Women argue that is has to be this way because if it was not, the woman would be trapped in the marriage. But they neglect to recognize that the man also is bound to the institution, and should not either be able to end it arbitrarily. Women should be bound to the marriage just as much as the man. If you take vows for better or worse, richer or poorer, sickness and in health, until death do we part, what part of those vows are unclear? Most men and women are unfit to enter the matrimony of marriage, simply because they have not been taught proper values and the true meaning of marriage. They think it is a big party and a way to get money (gifts). It is regarded as an illusive vanity parade for the youth, vowing to each other for at least the length of the honeymoon. Thus hopefully, if you are entering this institution, you are planning a long honeymoon, just in case you want it to last more then a couple of days.

Tongue Tied Twisted Tongue-Lashing

Some women and men, or both, would argue: “hey, we wrote our own vows”. Ok, so what vows were written? I do not buy that excuse because, only a fool would agree to “for vanity, not worse, definitely not in sickness, only health, for richer, but definitely not poorer, until it gets tough, do we part”. I mean really. Most written vows, even poorly written, promise more. Most written vows are fairly close to God’s traditional vows: “for better or worse, richer or poorer, sickness and in health, until death do we part”. This is because, you have to promise something, or it is not a vow. Religious or not, it is still a commitment to keep the marriage sacred. Forsake all others. Even if it is a marriage performed under the Satan religion, the vows extensively pledge both bride and groom to each other’s service forever. So, what does this mean? It means people do things for vain and pecuniary reasons, not spiritual reasons. Possibly, they will come up with capitalist vows that promise vanity, wealth, and material. But I think we covered that genus.

For Copious We Trust, Fissured We Stand

When two corporations merge, they become one. Sometimes the entities will retain their identity, sometimes the smaller entities are fazed out or “swallowed-up”. It could also mean “all chewed up and spit out”. Exactly. We, even if we do not know it, are by-products of capitalism. So we act, even when getting married, like possessed “agents of fortune” from hell. But we covered that, because even a marriage in hell promises more. So, what category does a marriage in commercial corporate North America reside? Shekels. It seems to be a harsh reality, but true. Most people will end marriages because it is not “turning a profit”. Not economically feasible. Not copious. At the same time, people will stay in marriages that are profiting, at least until they can find a lawyer that will not take most of the divorce spoils. That usually indicates a lover that happens to be a lawyer.

Prenuptial agreements may prevent people from marrying strictly for money. But that is only imposed if one or the other, or both, are wealthy and greedy at heart, or just have no trust for their fiancé. Either way, that sort of an agreement, in my opinion, puts a large calmant of mistrust in the marriage, thus will be doomed for failure, at least until a swanker suitor appears on the horizon.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on December 14, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016