Author: dynorex

Posted on

Step-Mother of Inventions. Did I not see that before?

Full 360 Asphalt Pirouettes

I remember a while back, decade or two ago, a Mad Magazine article about the evolution of the roller skate, whereby it evolved into the roller blade, and back again. By the article’s illustration, the wheels went from side by side horizontal alignment, slowly intersecting vertically, then slowly back to the horizontal, (original) alignment. Thus showing a loop of inventions, or more realistically, modifications, of the roller skate, to the roller blade, right back to the roller skate. I thought the article (comic) was priceless because it showed the folly of original creation. The surrogate of innovation. The Step-Mother of invention.

Genuine Intention or Intensive Forgery

Inventions have and still are, built off something else, an idea, or article, or sometimes a series of articles or ideas already though of or created. This has always been the norm and as long as the outcome was genuinely original, then it received a patent for the idea or prototype, or actual creation. Intellectual creations can be registered/patented as original, but are extremely difficult to prove if someone plagiarizes. Still, these systems are in place and are anything but inexpensive to utilize, thus making it a system for the wealthy and the 1 percenters (corporations) to use after they steal the original thought from an employee or an unsuspecting inventor/artist submitting their idea/material for evaluation.

Songwriter Competition! Win a Trip to Nashville and Meet the Stars!

I mean lets be serious. Why do you think Nashville had so many famous artists with fabulous, original material that are No. 1 hits? Because these artists were talented, or good for that matter? We have all seen the obscure ads in magazines, papers, new rags, asking people to submit their material (poems/music) for evaluation for different motivations, like stardom, fame, money, prizes. But in a nutshell, it was a scam to steal your intellectual property. Where else do you think these halfwit artists get their material? From you dummy. Most of these artists are not artists. They are performers/musicians that never had an original thought in their lives.

Invention Prevention Protection for the Relentless Pretentious

To be fair, their are some artists that have made it through the swine dribble, able to perform their original material, but few and far between. If you think I am just spit-balling, then just take a look at all the patents that Tesla submitted and how few came to reality. Why? Because he had no interest in serving the wealthy and the 1 percenters. He wanted to serve the masses even though he was spawned from a wealthy family. Thus the 1 percenters (mainly Edison) made it their goal in life to trash Tesla at every turn. Despite all the reputation trouncing and defamation, Tesla is still today a very respected and renown inventor. He died broke by the way.

Publishing Stealing House

Internet publishing makes things a bit easier to submit original thoughts, create a following, make money, but all in all, has not solved the problem of plagiarism. It has made it far worse, sort of speak, because there are some people on the internet that have mastered the “high jacking” of intellectual property. If you come out with an original thought, they will “high jack” it and call it their own. If a movie is in the theater or a new CD/Blu ray have been released, they “high jack” the internet stream and publish it via VPN (virtual private network), torrents, or both. The more unexperienced “high jackers” just upload the content to YouTube to get several thousand hits to make some fast money before the material is taken off their channel by the internet anti-plagiarizing entity. Who are, or what is this entity? I don’t know.

Cannot say I feel sorry for the corporations or greedy performers/musicians/actors/producers that plagiarized the material in the first place. But I do feel for the legitimate artists/musicians/actors/producers that are genuinely trying to promote their original material. You see I left out corporations in the latter statement. I mean, why feel sorry for those money grabbers. Corporations are like the mafia, or syndicate (and the mafia does exists), always trying to make money off the blood and sweat of others.

Hollywood Street Sweepers

Hollywood is a mess and always has been and always will be until they, all of the sudden, clean up their act, which will never happen. Hollywood has a foundation of death, prostitution, broken ambitions, ideals, dreams, that forms a cess pond of lust and destruction fuelled from the original thoughts of unsuspecting residum. It is a wonder that anything good can be spawned from that corporate stench mill of venality. The key word here is corporation, corporate, conjoint, hoarded, syndicated. If you are in, you are just a tool, or fool of compliance for the top executives that are just puppets for the 1 percenters.

Go Back to your Plow, Johnny!

So, if you are thinking of starting your career in Hollywood, please think again and find something else to do, unless this description excites you. Then, by all means, go for it, and good luck. In a nutshell, there is nothing truly original, but if you come up with a good idea, do not tell your employer. Work with it yourself. Try to manifest the idea on your own, then try to sell the idea in pieces, keeping the key pieces until you see some money. Promises of money means, “give us your idea and we will evaluate it’s marketability, then, don’t call us, we will call you.” Next thing you know, you see your idea making millions of dollars for the 1 percenters who have written you off totally, into ambiguity. In other words, “who are you again?” they will deny any collaboration with you.

Just a Good, Red Blooded All Corporate North American Thief

Step-Mothers of Invention are everywhere. They are the ones that stole an original idea, or just took credit for the creation that was not originally successful or orphaned. There are so many examples of this plagiaristic phenomenon that it is almost getting to be accepted as normal, red blooded behavior. You will notice that I said, “almost” because we that are not brainwashed to think that this is normal behavior, think it is iniquitous and attuned, mutilated ruminative. Original thought processes are obtained from inspiration and integrity, which is why I think, their are only a few individuals that are truly capable. Mainly because there are too many money grubbing people that get lured to the rapacious.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on November 21, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Corporate Broadcasts Co-Corruption

And the Dung-balls Keep on Rollin’

Some programs (radio, television, cable, streams etc.) relentlessly promote the 1 percenters idealism from dusk ’til dawn, only breaking for the national (main con stream media) news. They even play, well, I think you can call it music (radio), but that would be very debateable, and even the classic rock stations are just playing the same old “hits” of that time over and over. Anyone that likes that snobbish, intellectual diarrhea and/or repetitiveness, is definitely a 1 percenter, wannabe, or just too dammed conformed.

Where do the broadcast producer’s and editor’s priorities really lie? Because, they must be puppets on a string controlled by a higher hierarchy, ultimately leading to a hierarchal, pushing the 1 percenter’s agendas. The personalities of these shows, in my opinion, have the ultimate dream jobs. Because as long they keep slinging vomit patties to the public, the hierarchal will be satisfied, and because this hierarchal does not like change, will keep these personalities on the same broadcast shows, until the are too old, grey, feeble, and senile.

I Dream of Authenticity With a Veritable Flair

It is just an example of this hierarchal riding out the success of a formula until you just cannot beat the dead horse anymore. I mean, really. Ratings are the key to any program, but anyone that has knowledge of how they actually collect information on ratings, would consider the method, shoddy and selective at best. That is why certain programs, unbeknown to anyone, survive.

There may be some people that think the main con stream media reports the news in a truthful manner. However, half truths come to mind because that is the only way to make it semi-believable, thus the stories should be based on some sort of fact. This, however, does not make the foundation anymore sound, just subject to what version has been told, and the interpretation of the dung slurry, that was carefully mixed with a truthful fact or two.

We Cannot Tell the Truth, The Whole truth, and Nothing But the Truth, So Help us God!

Reporters and personalities would argue that they have to follow a format or they will lose their jobs. Pussies! That is all that come to mind when I think about that sort of compliance. Although they have a point I guess because if they do go against the grain of the network’s strict adherence to the 1 percenters pecuniary dictatorship, they are out of a job. I say, that is understandable. But, if they were faithful to the news and reported the truth, people will listen, because no one likes to be screwed over and lied to, all in the name of saving and making money, for the wealthy and the 1 percenters. We need reporters and news mediums with some balls.

Where Can I Hear the Truth? Do I Have to Take an Oath?

I would imagine that is why there is such a large swing to alternative media to get the news. However, the main con stream is attempting to contaminate the alternative pool and trying to “buy it up” exercising damage control methods to save the main con stream media’s ass, sort of speak. Because, once the masses start veering away from the main con stream media’s influence, that puts everything commercially fuelled in absolute jeopardy. No control for the wealthy, 1 percenters and their bought off politicians. It is too bad however, that the main con stream media is infiltrating the alternative stream because now there is a 50/50 split on what is genuine alternative media and what is corrupted, alternative media. This basically attempts to push the ridiculous in place of the truth, in the vain attempt to push people back the to main con stream media.

Bull Dung Overflowing the Levees of Our Reason.

This all makes me think of the bleak conversations I had the misfortune, more then once, of hearing at my work places over the years. I think everyone in the commercial corporate North America has had this misfortune. Overhearing these individuals venting their dissatisfaction on how some people are on welfare and why they are not working instead of living off the government’s tit. How it is such a financial burden to the tax payers made up of individuals that do work supporting these lazy people. How they should not have to pay more tax then a person that makes $20,000.00 dollars a year because those people are just plain stupid and cannot get a better job, therefore should be living in a slum, but not low cost housing because that puts a strain on the tax payers that make over $35,000 dollars a year. This is a result of corruptive, greedy thinking that has been brainwashed into the tiny brains of those complaining individuals. I actually feel sorry for them.

Reporters and News Mediums Really Follow Their Sworn Oaths to Bring Forth the Truth? Hmmm.

But we can thank that sort of attitude to main con stream media that has smeared this type of thinking into peoples psyche ever since they were old enough to watch TV, or some other corruptive medium. How the only important people are the “winners” of society and how we, the “losers” (masses) have to worship them to be put in our proper place in society. To have our brains nourished from the 1 percenters brainwashing sewage spew. If you think that is over the top, then obviously you like the taste of the 1 percenter’s dung meal.

In God’s eyes, we are all equal and unique humans that have received the gift of free will . Why do you think religion and the mention of God is so shunned in these times. We all know why. The people that believe in spiritualism are in direct contradiction with the main con stream media and commercialism. Because capitalism teaches us, that the rich (greedy) are correct and anything else, that does not make money for the wealthy and 1 percenters, is simply just outworn and does not conform with greed, thus has to be shunned. Ergo I warn, the 1 percenters should beware of the wrath, that will surface, from non-conformity and spiritualism. Because to be truly spiritual, you have to be an individual.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on November 16, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

My Country and Your Country are Pelted By the Mire..

Central Illusive Agency

Syria? Who really knows WTF is happening in the middle east especially in Syria. Syria and Iraq or somewhere in there, is where the birth of ISIS developed. You know, that phoney baloney anti Christian fundamentalist rebellion group who is really a CIA developed surrogate, agitator group designed to create upheaval and rebellion in the middle east, creating unrest and a dust storm, to cloak the greed for oil, and the completion of the pipeline, to feed the 1 percenters pockets with insane oil profits. Man, what a joke.

The Wall has Crumbled, but the Propaganda still Floats

Now Russia, as been reported by the main con stream media, is attacking Syria. Ok, then it is the world against Syria? Who knows. But was it not the USA a few short months ago doing the same thing or at least threatening to? Israel is made out to be the agitators of this whole mess, but we all know it is commercial, cooperate run and owned North America, creating this swine-pen dribble. Still trying to make Russia look like a militant, communist country, with a militant leader. And who says this? Commercial corporate North America says so, that’s who.

Electro-Magnetic Puke Shield

Russia, Iran and some other countries are supposedly going to wage war with the world. Destroy North America. They are suppose to have a secret, powerful, EMP weapon(s) that will totally disable North America, then summarily, nuke the royal dung out of North America and other “free” countries. EMP devices do exist, and theoretically, can disable electronics/electrical components. But these components, can be easily fixed and/or shielded for prevention of EMP devices or just general naturally developed EMP waves or other destructive magnetic waves or signals. Also, EMP technology is hardly a new thing and commercial corporate North America has the same weapon technology.

I wish I was in Dixie, Away from Bull

It sounds like they are whistling “Dixie” through their bung holes, because if you have any brains whatsoever, that is exactly how it is going to sound. There is so much propaganda being piped down the main con stream and the alternative media pipes, mostly on the main stream, You Tube, Face Book, and other self publishing mediums. You cannot trust a lot of these feeds on either side. Why, because main con stream media and the commercial corporate owned politicians and North America know there is a big swing to alternative media, thus are infiltrating these mediums with vague personalities (posing as the anti-establishment gurus) to vent their propaganda. Keep you brainwashed. And, they make money off every hit.

Where the Hell is the Money Shot?

There are a lot of these alternative media feeds that are legitimately anti-establishment, and freedom orientated individuals that uncover very interesting news and vent these stories as it should be displayed. This would not include however, Christian fundamentalist groups and individuals, or otherwise that have channels trying to convince everyone that Obama (America’s first black president) is evil because he is black. Of course, they do not come out and say this, they just try to make him look like the anti-Christ. It is so obvious, that it is nauseating. Yet, these bigoted puke slingers keep right on with these videos/stories. You know, kind of like soft pornos. You see a lot of tail, but never any penetration.

Click them Your Money, Please

Thus, my word of caution to all who dabble in alternative media. Know who you are listening to and/or reading. Do your own research and stay away from the ridiculous. Beware of shills calling others shills. Just use your own common sense and avoid being a sheep. And the biggest tell tale of them all, is when it is a sale’s pitch to buy a book or whatever. Remember, they get paid per hit on You Tube and other commercial fuelled sites. So why give them more money. You already paid for your entertainment by clicking on it, even if you do not watch, read or listen. Especially beware of supposed religious oriented or otherwise news feeds, declaring the end of the world, country, or economy every two to three weeks, asking for money for survival tips, kits or other redundant information that your own government (even though they may be commercially, profit orientated) will provide for free. Beware most of all, of the main con stream media because they have not told us the truth since the Nixon administration.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on November 6, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Pecuniary Princesses’ Mental Mentors

Queen Bees, not Black Widows

Kristen Mary Kardashian (mother), and daughters Kourtney, Kim, Khloe, Kendell, and Kylie, all the products of the Pecuniary Princess Syndrome . Kris, the mother, married Robert Kardashian in 1955, the decade where the “Pecuniary Princess” syndrome was birthed. Later in 1991, she married Bruce Jenner and produced (already mentioned) daughters Kendell, and Kylie. Commercial (corporate) North America have found great uses for these role models, to push their bisexual agenda, attempting to create some sort of unisex culture for the masses to adopt.

In other words, unless you are a 1 percenter, then you should follow our role model’s lead how to act, dress, wear your hair, etc. because, well, you are just too damned worthless to be yourself. I seen in one of the rag tabloids portraying the Kardashian women as “Black Widows” because they have been summarily destroying their spouses (men). I would think that the “Queen Bee” analogy would be more appropriate, because the “Queen Bee” has drones (male bees) which are produced from the unfertile eggs.The drone will mate with the Queen and his penis and associated abdominal tissues are ripped from the drone’s body after sexual intercourse. Sound familiar? Look at Bruce Jenner.

No Cock in the Hen House

WTF has happened to Bruce Jenner? I think he is just too lost in substance abuse to really know what he is doing. Hopefully I am wrong, because, imagine if he were you and you woke up and felt your crotch and said, “where is my penis?” However the greater question in my mind is how can anyone really buy this sewer scribe. North Americans cannot really be this stupid, can they? I call it brainwashed. No one in their right mind would be entertained by this idiocy. Yet, if you are a woman, you will be empowered to emasculate your current or potential mates, therefore aborting your children before they are ever even conceived playing out the “worker bee” role, keeping the women of society chasing that carrot they will never snare. Men, well who cares what they think because ultimately, besides their sperm, they are mainly useless (drones) in line to be castrated.

Just Hit Me with a Sledge Please

When I see stories like this on the TV or in some news rag, I get chills down my spine, then fear sets in, in light of this all really happening around us. I pinch myself and say, please wake up, it is only a dream. But it is not a dream. Commercial (corporate) North America, because they control politics and politicians, are making sure that it is being inbred into our daily lives, like inbreeding in the Cajun culture. No regard for religion or what is truly proper and correct. Forging a corrupted morality, perverted and full of distain. Once fully forged, we will not know the difference of true right and wrong, whereby the rightest is the one that makes the most money.

Blooded Funny Money

North America, especially in the USA, has a big problem that is just growing in size, and the more people that get themselves deprogrammed from commercial brainwashing, the more distance these individuals will put themselves from this corruption machine. People may say, “it was the same when the Nazi’s were in power”, or “look at Vietnam”. “That stuff happens over there”. This may be true, but the Nazi’s brainwashed a nation into killing 6 million Jewish people by utilizing the Jews in concentration (slave labor) camps, forced to work themselves to death. Vietnam was a corporate maneuverer. Had nothing to do with winning or losing the war. Just to protect corporate investments and assets. And look at Cambodia, Laos, Panama, Columbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and on and on. War makes money from others misfortunes.

Your Sex is Ok, My Sex is Ok, So what is the Problem?

This agenda really has nothing to do with the “gay” movement. But has certainly latched on to it to create a separatism between the bisexual, unisexual and the heterosexual. My proof is, that they (corporate North America) did not invent these sexual tendencies. They have all been around for centuries, but they would like everyone to think it is a “new” thing so it will be guaranteed to be adopted by a portion of society, thus leaving the portion that chooses not to embrace it, separated. Do they (corporate North America) really care who wins? Not really, because their objective has been achieved. Less reproduction, more divorce, and separatism, debt dependency, more depression, suicide and death of the population. More sales of alcohol, drugs, healthcare and tobacco across the board. All of which funnels hordes of money back to the pockets of the 1 percenters.

Illusion or Allusion, is there really a difference?

To keep the masses mesmerised by the Kardashians and other fabled-famed celebrities is the goal of commercial North America. In the 1970’s, where music and rock stars held peoples attention, convincing the masses that a particular rock group, or entertainer had the secret to the mythology of life, keeping the masses buying up all their intellectual property in exchange for insane profits. Profit for the false prophets, then, and more so today. These master bards keep us mesmerized, leading all of us to ruin. Don’t get me wrong. Plenty of good original music came out of that era, and even today, although cloaked, there is some great intellectual creations, but at the same time, it is more controlled and scrutinized then it ever was before, counting on peoples greed to convert this intellectual property, into intellectual swill.

Most celebrities are victims of greed. Most celebrities get caught in a financial maze, just like the masses, but a much larger scale, to ensure, when needed, that celebrity will do exactly what they are told when needed, at the right moments. Like the Kardashian women. Or Bruce Caitlyn Jenner. Many others to be sure. What happens to the celebrity that resists? Just think of door hangers in August, 2014. The Jokers grand finale. Fast and Furious WTF release was that? Just hanging around in the closet, hands tied, meditating for kung fu kicks.

You might think I am sick. But remember, I never made any of that up. I prefer my original creations have a bit more soul, and less mayhem. To have some light at the end of the tunnel. Because if I cannot see that, it is truly a dark moment.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 30, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Dating Sites Revisited

My Direct Experiences with Online Dating Sites

I would have to warn you, that they are not good experiences whatsoever. So if you are looking for a happy ending sort of speak, you may not want to read this post.

The Excitement, the Mystery, the Endless Questions

When you first setup your profile, you get pretty excited about the possibilities. You follow the sites recommendations how to setup your profile for “proven results” and go the extra mile doing their online personality assessments for chemistry, needs, and etc. Then you start messaging women or men depending on your preference and orientation. I am strictly heterosexual so I messaged heterosexual (or so the say) women.

Cocked and Loaded to Message some Dames to Kill For

All in all, at first, you start messaging all the girls that appeal to you on the site. You quickly find out that women do not message you back at all if they do not like you. They also do not message you on occasion if they do like you. Some of them delete your message without reading the message. Definite sign she does not like you and most likely it would be your picture so you would then change it with a better one, preferably one where you are smiling .

Other girls will message you, or hit your profile, so you will see them, leaving a subtle hint to message them. Out of those, you usually find a date, about one per week, if the previous date did not pan out. Be prepared to do this several times. Be prepared to be disappointed. Look at Dating Sites Issue No 4 and 5. Men and especially women use old pictures, or a mixture of old and new pictures. The idea of course is to make themselves look younger and more appealing.

You Got a Date! Whoa

But, when you date them, you immediately see that they are older looking, usually much older or overweight or both. If you can get over this hurdle then you can start the date. I usually go through with the date anyway, to give them a chance to show me their personality. Sometimes, (not often) it can make up for the deception.

The biggest hurdle however when dating, with 90% of these women, (and I am sure men too) is the bull dung. Even though you may be honest, used recent pictures, and indicated that you want a relationship, does not mean your date, who lied about their age, used old pictures, and lied about their body shape, suddenly told the truth about wanting a relationship. This is the biggest hurdle because being a honest (naive) person, you will be totally unaware that they want a one night stand. Sex. The old hokey, pokey. The old hammer and nail. The old tongue and groove. The old hide the snake. The old 3 step out the window(if they turn out married).

That is all you Want is Sex? I am not that Kind of Boy/Girl

The biggest thing that your date will try and do is manipulate the conversation enough to make it your idea to go for a one night stand. That way, the next day, hour, or minute, either at your place or theirs, or hotel room (red flag), you go your separate ways with no obligation. Also, they do not have to worry about you clinging to them so they can try someone else next week, or leave you at their beckon call. Oh yes, that is the way it goes or will go, depending on how far you allow it to progress, and whether you know the truth or not. If they think you do, then they will play out the con.

I fell for this scenario a couple of times, but am wise to this now. Problem is when you start confronting the date with more relationship questions, and how committed they would be, that puts a huge damper on the date, and it will end with no progress. If the date is a good liar, they will play along until you are in bed, then after, let the axe fall, severing the relationship before it grows. Yes you will be heart broken but you will get over it. Just wipe your nose, block the user, and move on. Don’t give them a second chance! They will just use you again.

Truth or Consequences! Or a Crazy, Jealous, Attacking Spouse

The next date scenario is the semi-honest dater, genuinely wanting a relationship. They usually look about the same as the picture, sometimes better, and appear very interested. The issue with these daters is communication, or the lack of communication. They are very limited in imagination to converse, and usually will chat just long enough to get the date established. If anyone remembers that Lynyrd Skynyrd song that states “Don’t ask me no questions, and I won’t tell you no lies”.

These daters will possibly bale out of the first date. But establish another date. So, even though you were stood up, they smoothed it out with another date offer. But here is the catch. You have to message them several times. The ratio will be approximately 4 of your messages to 1 of theirs. Sometimes they will not answer you for a week. And just when you have given up on the date, and started to make new plans, they will call or message you to confirm the date.

When on the date, they are congenial and will talk and go with the mood. They rarely however add anything to the conversation, only elaborate on what is being said, or what was asked. When answering, will speak in generalities. Once the date is done, they immediately want to say goodbye and go home. They will offer or accept to see you again, let you kiss them, and off they will go. You will probably wonder, “was that a good date? Or WTF?

Are you Really Glad to See Me? Or is That the Smell of Jack Daniels?

Between the first date and the next, the message ratio will be about the same, 4 to 1, and you will barely confirm the second date. The second date will go the same as the first, with it ending, getting a kiss, and a promise of a third date. Between the second and the third date will be the same scenario. Lack of solid 2 way communication. If you ever bed this date, or get a commitment out of them, you will be lucky.

This can only indicate 3 scenarios with this date:

 

  1. They are married and in a bad relationship.
  2. They are committed to a boyfriend in a bad relationship
  3. They are an alcoholic or substance abuser

In all scenarios, this would account for the span of time they do not communicate or see you. It accounts for the “it is 12:00 midnight, and I am about to turn into a pumpkin if I do not go home now”. It accounts for them always staying home, supposedly alone, and seemingly sick or tired all of the time. It accounts for the meetings to continue in public rather then being invited to their house. They may accept an invitation to your house, but will be strict on when they have to leave. Always seemingly very cautious.

All 3 scenarios are consistent to the above accounting. You can hang in there to see if you ever get closer, but do not be surprised if you can not get to second base, or some monster S.O.B. suddenly suckers you and knocks your block off. This can also mean, if she does let you into her life, you will soon witness the substance abuse or alcoholism. This dater proved to be an alcoholic.

It is the 3rd Date, So Can’t We Have Sex?

Some relationship expert on the web said, Quote “finds that baby boomers are far more likely to wait to have sex than younger daters” Unquote. WTF, is this expert on drugs? This expert is only 28 yrs old and has no real long term relationship experience. Thus, has no clue other then their “slide rule” analogy to relationships and dating. But people listen to this person and that is what is scary. A 28 year old with relationship experience? Not my first choice for advice.

As a rule, men expect to have sex sooner then women. Women tend to hold the reins back, waiting to see if this person will return or show interest. Then, when she is sure he is interested, and she has some sexual attraction to this person, will allow his advances to have sex, usually in a passionate manner. There are cases with, both, young and older daters, that it will end up in the sac the first night. It has nothing to do with age. It has all to do with passion and chemistry. If there is no passion or chemistry, you are wasting your time. If you are not laid by the third or forth date, it may not have the “spark” needed start the relationship. Unless you are members, (both of you) of a religion, and are faithful to it’s teachings of waiting until marriage.

We Won’t Get Tooled Again

Another quote from this same expert, Quote “Especially among older people who went through the sexual revolution, with maturity they realize there are emotional consequences for getting involved in a sexual relationship” Unquote. This is another “slide rule” calculation. The sexual revolution, (60’s to mid 70’s) was nothing more then a drug induced orgy. Psychologically, it was a rebellion against the 50’s, but really, it was a rebellion against the establishment and arranged marriages. Now, you would say, “arranged marriages only happens “over there”, not here”. My explanation to that is, where do you think you descended from, unless you are aboriginal? You descended from “over there”.

The Longer We Wait, The More Chance Of Defeating Fate

Another so called “relationship expert” said in a nutshell, new couples, young or old, should wait a minimum of 90 days to have sex. Wars have been won in shorter periods. 3 months? Most certificate courses take that long. One full semester. Well, this may work in college and university because, in the first semester, you both will be bogged down with homework, and barely have time to have lunch together. The time will joust by, and what better way to celebrate the success of a first semester? With some, good, old fashioned, unadulterated sex. You both would have earned it, if you waited that long, which I highly doubt.

Hi, I like your Profile! How much Money do you Make Again?

This brings me to another date acquired by a dating site. This time, there seemed to mutual interest and full two way communication. She looked a older then her picture, but she was still attractive, just greyer. We seemed to have some common interests, played pool, I paid for the drinks, and we kissed on the first date! Great start right? Lots of communication between dates and hordes of pecuniary questions (red flag). But because this dater actually seemed sincere and liked to communicate, I vented my pecuniary status to a large enough degree, until the questions tapered. That meant basically providing a verbal financial statement, you know, like I was applying for a loan.

This brought my enthusiasm down a couple of notches, but tried to move on from there, going to the second date. We went for coffee first and talked, then after, planned to go to the movies. Keep in mind, this woman has only vented the surface of her own pecuniary status to me, but expected so much more verification of my pecuniary status. The show went well, paid by me, and we held hands, and kissed later. She then abruptly ended the date, and went home. I, during our communications, between the second and third date, started to talk more romantic, giving her suggestive compliments, how I desired to be close to her. Mistake.

So, you are a Daddy’s Girl?

This woman did not respond well to this conversation, and instead of taking the compliments in stride, which would not of committed her to anything, decided to attack the conversation, like throwing a bucket of ice cold water on your naked body. Making it very clear that she, at this point had no thoughts or desires to have any type of sexual relationship and would not have any idea when she would be interested having sex. This would of been fine I guess, but I never asked her to have sex yet. In fact, I got the same lecture from her planning the second date, when I suggested, instead of going to the movie theater, to go to her house, or mine to watch movies using my Amazon Fire Stick. At no time then, did I ask to have sex, but in answer, she stated she did not trust me enough to have in her home for the possibility of sexual interaction. At that point, I was beginning to suspect this woman had strong sexual deviant issues and did not trust men whatsoever.

Lets go for Supper Then? I’m buying anyway. And by the way, I just got laid off.

I ended that synopsis of the conversation, that was leading no where fast, and asked her to go out for dinner on out third date. She accepted and went to dinner as planned. She seemed to be in good spirits and we had a good meal. Knowing that she wanted to go to the bar later, to shoot pool and drink, I decided to talk about the conversation we had, before the date. I attempted to explain, that we have dated enough, to decide if we should get more intimate, at least conversation wise. Again, she gave me the same treatise, of not knowing in her mind when she would be ready for sex.

This would of been fine again, but all I was asking is to get more close and intimate, not to have sex. The more I tried to explain the difference, the more she distrusted what I was saying, like I was trying to con her into bed. Thus, I decided to end the date there saying I had a headache. I turned the tables on her, making her the pursuer. But at this point, I decided not to pursue this relationship at all. And, when she called me the next day, venting, that her relationship needs were different then mine, I told her I was laid off. That seemed to get rid of her because I have not heard from her since. That is proof in the pudding, she was only looking to increase her financial security without having to put out.

That is about it. If I go on more quirky dates, I will update this post, or the other, or both. Happy dating!

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 27, 2015

 

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Dating Sites

“The Problem with Dating Sites is”

Too many con artists. The conception of the “Dating Site” originally computer dating, where a computer with inputted data about different men and women would attempt to match the couple according to their interests, age, creed, relationship, desires, etc.

Now, the philosophy is somewhat the same, but allowing the user to enter this data on the actual website with little or no scrutiny, rather then submitting a questionnaire at the computer dating company where they could clearly see if you are a man or woman, old or young, etc.. This induced upon the user to use a certain amount of honesty that would make sense to the personnel processing the data from your submission.

Even if the user had to mail the information to the dating company, there was still a certain amount of scrutiny to be at least semi-honest. Once the computer bulletin board became popular, then later the actual websites, that gave birth to cyber dater. In other words, WYSINNWYG. What you see is not necessarily what you get.

This can cause a number of issues, especially for free dating sites. All you really need on a free dating site is a valid email address. And that is about it as far as verification goes. The issues that this causes is too many to mention. A few would be pertinent to at least list however.

  1. Men posing as women
  2. Women posing as men
  3. Men and Women lying about their age
  4. Men and Women using old pictures
  5. Men and Women stating they want a relationship, but really want a casual one night stand
  6. Prostitutes (male and female) using the site to solicit services
  7. Scammers posing as young men and women, trolling for older men and women, to con them out of money to free them from some foreign country, they are phonily financially anchored.
  8. Men and women sharing unsolicited illicit photography of themselves to potential suitors.

The list goes on and on.

The Actual Date

On the most part, if you expect a female, that is usually what shows up and visa-versa. However, only 60% of these will look actually close to the pictures. On the most part, they are usually heavier and older then the pictures, but the right sex. Only 40 to 50% of these turnouts actually want a relationship even if their profile stated that is what they want. And, if they feel pressured into a relationship agreement for further dating, in most cases, that is where it will end or shortly thereafter. Chances are that you will meet some very scary people. You know, like that commercial one popular dating site uses that attempts to show if you purchase their service, you will never be surprised by a scary date again? Well, surprise, surprise! You will meet liars, adulteresses, adulterers, perverts, prostitutes, schizophrenics, sexual and physical abusers, drug attics, junkies, alcoholics, and your average, everyday weirdos. If you meet someone normal? You are very fortunate.

Premature Jack Action

So why do people even use these sites is beyond comprehension. The best answer would be, it is a quick way of finding a date. Even though it may not be what you expect and can be downright aggravating, you still get some social interaction with a live human being, well, most of the time. But the sincere beware. There a lot of “trolling trolls”, male and female just looking for “jack action”, or a free meal. Some of these so called “dates” are just looking for a “backup date” or an “envious accession suitor”. What is an “envious accession suitor”? That is when the male or female attempting to get another suitor back through jealously, so you become the “envious accession suitor”, being used in a pathetic attempt to lure you out on a date, and/or to their home, knowing that the desired suitor is watching by surveillance, thus inducing contact from the desired suitor through possessive jealousy. Some people that are possessive and jealous, even though the have more then one lover, cannot stand another other suitor in the company of their (lovers) property.

Creepy Crawly Posers (Witches and Warlocks)

When this possessive jerk/bitch goes back to the person you just dated, you are not needed anymore, or at least not at the moment. You will receive a “Dear john/Jane” text/message politely asking to be friends, or saying they just decided that you are not what they are looking for as a mate. But one would think that they could of just said that at the first meet. That is what the initial meeting is about. In a nut shell, there seems to be a lot of dater abusive suitors not sincere no matter how they attempt to appear initially. If you meet, then date someone, and you have more then one date, with the suitor showing no signs of dislike or refusing contact (holding hands), and the next day they send you the “Dear John/Jane” text/message out of the blue, you can be pretty sure that you have been used. Especially be aware of the first meet turning into a date and lasting over 5 hrs, and then being invited into their home. Sure sign that they are trying to “advertise” that you are dating them, attempting to induce jealousy, or their spouse is out of town for the night. Either way, you may be wise to refuse going into their abode, and just to go home, to avoid possible conflicts and/or severe bodily harm.

Three Thug Night (Mama Told Me not to Go)

I was told/warned through the “online dating grapevine”, that one abusive dater(female) actually hired 3 thugs to severely beat a man (almost to death) she was dating because he caught her messing around and wanted to end the relationship. Thus, you can see the real dangers of online dating. This dating medium seems to empower the reckless and non-sincere individuals using the “deceptive cloak” that online dating sites provide because of their lack of identity verification. You might as well just use Craigslist because what is the difference? To be a successful online dater requires a “proverbial horseshoe” up one’s rectum. However if you are just looking for low quality entertainment and company, then online dating is your “one stop” shopping place. You will find more insincere dates then you cheating heart can handle.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 27, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Films Today!

When Men Were Men and Women Were Women. When was that again?

I was looking through the latest theater movies last week and decided to watch Sicario which was basically about the drug trade and how Homeland Security and other agencies were trying to keep the USA clean of drugs. This movie bothered me on so many levels that if I went through them all, this would a book and not a post.

This movie is brain wash material if I ever watched one. But more scary is the fact that they portray real men with bisexual tendencies. I use the description, “real men” very loosely because this is just a distorted vision either a Hollywood writer, director or producer or all three. Or, because it has Homeland Security stamped all over the movie footage, could mean Homeland Security had a large influence on this film.

If you watched this movie, you would know which scene or scenes I am referring to, and if you do not, watch the movie. The top billed star of the movie was a woman and she played the born again tough bitch FBI agent Macer, that emasculated her partners by her confident persona, making the poor chaps look like a wimps. The only men in the film she did not emasculate was the story characters Gillick and Graver whom are portrayed as the “real men” with bisexual tendencies.

Note: I am not using the actors real names because this post is not here to promote the famous. If you want to know what actors they are, look it up on Wikipedia.

Where Real Men are Bisexual Men and Women Emasculate Men

Is this a twisted contrast? Twisted Plot or just plain a gay agenda? I left the theater wondering WTF? I paid to see this swill? I thought the movie was well done and had some moments, but in the final assessment, it was pig feed. Then I started looking at all the recent movies, and just by looking at the titles and description, could not find anything that did not lean the same way as the “Emasculation Plot” in Sicario. In other words, I started looking through older movies which sucks a bit because I already seen them.

Then I seen some promise. Knock, Knock, staring one of my favorite actors and a couple of women as the villains. I thought this may be worth a gander. So I watched the movie. This movie almost had me going, especially when the female duo came back and caught him by surprise and started holding him hostage. But then the story started to dismantle itself and eroded very quickly. This movie started to send so many twisted messages, too many to mention, but the main message is “destroy the family unit”. The other twisted message I am mentioning is: “When Men think they are Real Men they are Pedophiles and Real Women that were Victims of Pedophilia can get way with Murder”.

So lets destroy the Family Unit! It is the “In” thing to do! Is it not?

This movie could not be more clear on these messages, and take a plunge to the abyss with the “destroy the family unit” message, by the total trashing of the home, especially the immature vandalism of the family pictures, which by the way, how many families really have that many family pictures every square inch on the wall space of the home? Total exaggeration of how perfect the family was, and how extreme the attack on the family unit was portrayed with the extreme, immature vandalism of the family pictures. I mean who really wrote this puke? Satan himself?

I think even Satan would have wrote this movie with more class, so it may of been one of his legion demons. But, when you are already brainwashed and get influenced by more astute brainwashing, frequently experienced by writers that have the misfortune of writing for Hollywood, then sometimes, you end up with plain, incoherent writing. It could also just be the drugs they do in Hollywood. No excuses, it is just plain dunghill writing.

Conformity? We don’t need no Stinking Conformity!

Since when do we need films that are suppose to entertain, written in attempt to have us think in certain ways? We all know that the government, one way or the other, has tried to control Hollywood. In turn, people that write for Hollywood, conform to certain genres, styles, and content. If not, it has no chance in hell to be produced into a film. Why cannot Hollywood find better writers? Because most good writers like to have there own control over the content and do not need the “editors from hell” forging their material into over exaggerated cess scribble.

Mentality wise, you have to watch most movies now with a large grain of salt. Yes, you may have some movies that are in the “normal zone” and according to the person watching dictates what normal is to them. If you produce a movie, you can produce what you want. If you go over the line of believable, then make it believable in the sense that anyone could put themselves into the position the movie is trying to get across. Pure fantasy movies have a lot of leeway to convince the viewer, but still has to make it believable that someone could find and ride a Pegasus, by first, where to possibly find one or summon one, and second, how you would approach the creature to mount and ride.

Where did I leave my Story Plot? I think I left it in the Inkwell!

Too many times, the movie leaves too much for the viewer to imagine or determine the origin of a situation and leaves them inattentive and yawning. Movies that take the time to walk the viewer towards these important details are the successful movies. But even the successful movies are laced with subliminal messages and images, sometimes embedded between frames, or in plain view for all to see, but usually do not consciously notice, laying the foundation for the suggestion that is formulated by a series of these messages or images. If I had any suggestion to anyone, it would be do not watch TV or movies. Even if you are aware, it still gets through to your subconscious.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 25, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Homophobic, or Heterophobic?

Where the Hell is Levis Quebec?

When I was a small boy, my mother divorced my father for another man, took my two sisters and moved to eastern Ontario, then later Quebec where she stayed in Levis Quebec (among other places). At this time, my brother and I was living at my Aunts because my father moved to the states to work with a construction company and once settled, would retrieve us to live with him.

But before that happened, my mother decided that she was to bring us to Levis to live, so away we went. Being a 11 year old boy, was excited and pumped up from the tales my mother told my brother and I about how great it was going to be with all of us together again. That story overall is very complex and vexing, so I will not explore that here. We later moved from the three room shanti where we all lived to Quebec city (across the river) to a much larger, very old colonial styled house and lived there for three years.

Wow, this Place is, err, Different

Here is where I was exposed to an array of people. Very different from the people that I knew back home. My mother was friends with several prostitutes. I guess that was because we lived in a very seedy, economically challenged area where a number of the women her age were either prostitutes or strippers, or both. We also met a lot of musician types because my mother’s live in spouse was a musician by profession.

There I was exposed to homosexual men for the first time. I did not know what a homosexual was, but was taught very fast when a male homosexual (one of the musicians) was attempting to convince me to touch his “lump” on his lower end of his stomach. Just as I was about to appease his request, my mother saw and heard what was happening and chased the man out of the house furiously. Then she gave me the facts of life about homosexuals.

Being young, I barely caught on what was being explained only that I was to keep my distance from those types of men when alone. This man was one of the musicians that was working with my mother’s spouse at the time. I was amazed after I understood what he attempted to do, that he was still allowed in our home, even for rehearsals.

The Good, The Bad, and the Phobic

I guess that should of given me a case of homophobic tendencies, but being a child, forgot about the incident very quickly and continued to live as a normal child, as normal as the circumstances of that area would allow. But now as an adult, I do not understand the term “homophobic” anymore then I understood fully what that man attempted to do to me when I was a child. If he was successful in his attempt, I may of been living a very different life, either traumatized from sexual abuse, or simply becoming a homosexual due to the influence that would of been imposed.

Is that being homophobic? I do not think so. There bad homosexuals and there are good homosexuals. There are good lesbians and bad lesbians. There are good bisexuals and bad bisexuals. Just as there are good heterosexuals and bad heterosexuals. I know there many more classifications like, transsexuals, hermaphrodites, transvestites, etc. But for the purpose of this discussion, I think I mentioned the adequate groups. Of course, there would be some people that would attempt to explain that mans behavior, but in the end, it was pretty plain he was trying to sexually abuse a child. And, there are heterosexuals and other mentioned and unmentioned groups that also sexually abuse children.

There is a movement now, depending what side of the fence you sit, to empower homosexuality, lesbianism and bisexualism as a mode of acceptable behavior. It is very obvious, and seems to accepted, and most do not seem to have a problem with this empowerment. In fact, the term bisexualism seems more fitting because since this empowerment, people on both sides of the fence that have never drifted before, have drifted back and forth in experimentation. Freedom of sexual preference.

To Birth or not to Birth, That is the Question

Large criticism of Russia discouraging the empowerment of homosexuals and lesbians has developed in recent years. What is the real reason for Russia’s scrutiny of these groups? They want people to act in a heterosexual manner to reproduce their dwindling population. The fact that they have more women then men would put a lot more scrutiny on homosexual behavior , strongly encouraging all men to reproduce with women, rather then pursue a same sex relationships that cannot reproduce naturally.

In countries that do not have that population issue, rather having too high of a birth rate, like countries in North America, encourage same sex relationships for the opposite reason. To cull the birth rate. But, again , some would argue that the Russia regime is nasty and hates homosexuals and lesbians. I say, I doubt it is that simple. That attitude works well for countries in North American, trying to revive the old communism, capitalism rivalry, especially with capitalism now being viewed as outworn, and just plain lopsided towards the 1 percenters and the wealthy. What is so hilarious about that argument is that Russia is not communist anymore.

A Word to Cull For

Being a heterosexual, do I care that homosexuals, lesbians and bisexuals can now, in many places, marry and adopt or have children using a surrogate or artificial insemination? No, why would it bother me? I do not really care what they do as long as they do it in an ethical, and responsible manner, free of abuse. But the term homophobic has got to go, because it is a term that is clearly created to cause upheaval between the same sex relationships and the heterosexual relationships. I would also say, if you are gay and use this term, then you are heterophobic.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 22, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016

Posted on

Canadian Election, Jeez…

The Liberals, led by Justin Trudeau win big in Canada, winning seats in every province, stealing both Conservative and New Democrat seats (mostly New Democrat) winning back some key seats in Ontario. What does this mean to Canadians? Who cares. Really. Jack Layton would have been spinning in his grave, how his legacy NDP victory, gaining historic amounts of seats (98 seats) in 2011, was totally mismanaged and squandered by the current party leadership.

Because they did not have a majority, they did not get anything substantial accomplished, mostly because they did not tag team with the Liberals to snip the strings on Harpo’s (Harper’s) harp. Some would say it was because Jack Layton died shortly thereafter his epic victory. I say, duh ya! The fact that the NDP ended up with 44 seats makes me wonder WTF they did to the party. I liked Jack Layton because he was one dangerous S.O.B..

I voted NDP again, because, well, Liberal color is red, Conservative color is blue (Navy Blue, I think), the Green party color is, well, green, and the NDP color is Orange. I decided on the fact that red, blue and green are not my lucky colors, orange being neutral. Pathetic you may say. But, I do not care because it is all a pile of dung anyway.

Hey, what do you expect? I once voted for the Doug Henning (Magician) Natural Law Party (1992). I wanted to see him make the “deficit disappear, now!”. That by the way was part of his campaign slogan. The party proposed yogic flying as a solution to the problems of the nation. Cool eh?

What’s even more amazing is the fact that the Conservatives still managed to keep 99 seats after totally hosing Canada for the last two terms. Harpo (Harper) must be a master bard, how he “harped” his way from losing more seats, and retaining a respectable amount. In fact, if it was not for the Atlantic side of the vote, we may of been listening to Harpo’s harp for another four years. Harpo is stepping down, but the Conservatives are nuts, they should keep his harp.

One thing I noticed about the average elected (male) Liberal is that they look like old greasers from the 1950’s or at the very least, beatniks from the late 1950’s and early to mid 60’s . Why is that? Justin Trudeau seems to resemble Frankie Avalon. If you look at his wife, she has a strong resemblance of Annette Funicello, just die her hair black and give her a B52 hair do, and voila. Party to their victory, Frankie (Justin) and Annette (Sophie) on the beach, the official 8th beach party movie. What on earth does this mean? I guess it means that because any Canadian beach will be much too cold this time of year, they will have to shoot the victory party in the studio set, and air it on the next Royal Canadian Air Farce episode, or shoot it on a beach in California or Florida which may mean increasing CBC’s government funding.

So, that could also mean, deep down, the majority of Canada want to be beach bums in California, or more appropriately, Florida where a lot of retired Canadians already spend the winter. This also means that the Conservatives and the NDP will have to play the role of the black leathered beach biker goons with black leather hats, always trying to spoil Frankie’s (Justin) and Annette’s (Sophie) beach parties. And, Elizabeth May (Green Party) can play the lonely beach geek always trying to get laid, scaring off all the beach boys and goons. Wicked. I am getting a rush just thinking about it.

Now that I have got your attention, or totally pissed you off, what advice do I have for the average Canadian with Justin at the helm? Hold on! It is going to be one hell of a ride! Or at least one awesome beach “party”.

“Tex” oNid ittEnEbEd (sHow nO mErcY)

Originally Published on October 20, 2015

© Copyright: dYnoReX and ADGMusic/Soft/Literature Org All rights reserved 2015-2016